Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 07:58

Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Life-building molecules discovered in the disk of a young star - Earth.com
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Pope Leo XIV Dons White Sox Hat During Public General Audience in Vatican - Sports Illustrated
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Why paracetamol – one of the world’s most common painkillers – works - The Jerusalem Post
Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
How does an experienced gay/bi guy handle a bi-courius guy on his first time?